Showing posts with label TALES FROM THE SEWER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TALES FROM THE SEWER. Show all posts

30.12.15

Sex. Again.

Even in a year when I wrote not more than 10 posts, only 2 of which were about sex, someone rocked up in the comments section and accused me of, “still bitching about sex.”  Now I ask you, is that what I do?  I’ve been labouring under the misguided impression that I was sharing knowledge, having valuable conversations, dispelling (and maybe accidentally creating) myths.  Useful shit.  But noooooo...  I’m just bitching about sex.  I wept into my cups that day.  And then the following day I resigned myself to my unfortunate reputation.  I figure, there as worse things on this internet than being known as the mama railing against bad sex, no?  I don't even have to issue a disclaimer any more, not if you deviant buggers read sex whenever I write, even when I write about the most nonsexual things.  It's brilliant.  Troubling, but brilliant.  To wit...

If what I keep reading on the interwebs is to be believed, there are way too many people out there having bad, nay, tragic sex.  Sex that involves pleasuring only one party.  Sex that involves more exertion than may actually be necessary, all in an attempt to be freaky.  Sex that involves pretending to be the person the other party desires, rather than who you really are.  Sex that does not involve any connection save for the mandatory touching of genitals.  Sex without intimacy.  Sex that does not involve nearly enough conscious decisions.  Sex that involves coercion, which may then no longer be sex, but rape.  If what I keep reading is to be believed, there are people out here, many people it seems, who think sex is a way to get one over someone else, a way for them to get what they want by any means necessary.

How the hell did we get here?

Because it's the second day of my official Christmas break (woohoo!) and this post is intefering with my Dr Who marathon, I’m going to skip all the scientific research mumbo jumbo and skip right ahead to the list, a list, I might add, I suspect I’ve already written before in all its many variations.  This is the year end summary of all things sex.  Ready?

1. Pleasure must be mutual.

For fuck’s sake, stop being so bloody selfish in bed.  You man, if you think pounding the woman for five minutes till you come is sex, you need to buy a plastic vagina and leave the real women alone, yes?  Just nod.  If you do not:
a. kiss her (all over, for the record, not just on her lips),
b. play with her boobs, where play involves hands and mouth, and maybe stubbly chin if she goes for the whole sandpaper effect on her skin,
c. stroke her back and/or belly and/or thighs and/or toes,
d. eat or finger her damn pussy, and/or ass if she goes for that too (please ask first),until she comes,
then you have no business inserting your business end into hers.  Comprende?

And you woman...yes, you...the same applies to you, only swop out d. for suck/lick his dick and/or balls, and/or ass if he goes for that too.  And throw in a quick lick or suck of that spot at the top of his hips, where there’s a dent in his body.  I don’t know if it works for all men, but some men apparently has a loose nerve lurking therabouts that seems to do the trick for them.  What?  I read that in a Cosmo once.  It's never worked for me and mine, but who knows?  I told you this won’t be scientific, figure it out for your own damn self.

Bottom line, pleasure is mutual, which means both (or more, no?) parties have to be satisfied.

2. Freaky sex isn’t necessarily the best sex.

Cunnilingus or fellatio, or analingus, is not for everyone.  Neither is doggy style, or reverse cowgirl.  And you know what?  That’s perfectly fine.  Not every woman has a yearning for sex outdoors, or a 50 shades fantasy.  Not every man wants to be tied up and flogged.  Not everyone wants to have a threesome.  The way they tell it, online at least, if you’re not having sex 3 times a day in all manner of positions or with all manner of implements, then your sex must be crap.  Nope.  Not even remotely.  Sex is as personal as the individual having it, so do what makes you happy.  Yes, I know that making someone else happy makes us happy, but you can only accommodate so far, no?  Once it becomes a case of you pretending to be someone you’re not, especially when freakiness is the issue, then maybe it's not worth it.

This sounds odd coming from me, I’m the one always pushing you to try new things, but after seeing (reading, mostly on twitter) what people are doing in the name of sexual liberation, I’ve come to embrace the more conservative amongst us.  That’s not to say I’ve become more conservative, hell will freeze over first, but even I have limits, and I’m no longer ashamed to admit it.  Be as freaky as you want.  Or don’t.  Anyone who has a problem with you needs to walk on by, yes?  Yes.

3. Seriously though, sex is supposed to feel good.

With the exception of the kinkier end of the spectrum where discomfort is part of the sexual experience and feeling good is somewhat more complicated (remind me to write that post one day, when I'm properly toasted ideally), sex is supposed to feel good.  Really, really good.  That’s kinda the whole point.  So if you’re out there having sex with a man who doesn’t take the time to get you aroused enough before he shoves it in (ouch!), or if you’re shagging someone who’s a bit rough on your parts and you don’t like it (men and women alike have just crossed their legs after recalling a particularly unpleasant memory), or if you’re fucking someone who makes you feel like crap (before, during or after), then don’t fuck with them, again.  It’s supposed to feel good.  On this one aspect, you cannot compromise.

4. Unless you are a prize arsehole, you will make some sort of connection. Deal with it.

Proponents of casual sex are staring at me with one eye.  Feelings types are getting ready to hoist me on my own petard.  I’m about to disappoint you both.  This is not a warning against no strings sex, go right ahead, I said some sort of a connection, not love or happily ever after, a connection.  It’s built into good sex, great sex even more so.

The way I see it, sex is simply about getting yourself off, it’s wanking with audience participation.  Good sex is about getting each other off, it’s more interactive, there’s give and take, I do you then you do me and then we do...us.  Great sex, however, is about pleasure, not just getting off, the act is as important as the end result.
Viva la Revolución! Or not. 

Yes, I quoted myself, but only because I think that was one of the most profound things I’ve ever said.  Clearly, I’m biased.

Tell me, how on earth do you propose to get someone else off without making even the most basic connection with them?  So how then do you turn around and claim intimacy-less sex could possibly be good?  Do you see my point?  You don’t, but I put it the list so I can refer you back here if and when you do something foolish.

5. Sex is a conscious decision.

We all like to have a slightly (or very) drunk roll in the hay from time to time, at least those of us fond of the tipple do.  Alcohol lowers inhibitions, makes it...I’m not sure easier is the right word, but it fits...alcohol makes it easier for us to let our guard down, doesn’t it?  Thing is, and this is where the complications arise, sex is something we choose to do, consciously.  I need to repeat that.  We choose to have sex.  We don’t stumble into bed randomly, or accidentally land on a penis, we choose.  Alcohol, or drugs, impairs our ability to make decisions.

See, it’s one thing when this drunk sex is being had between two people who already have a sexual relationship, the decision to have sex may already have been made, but what of people who are not already shagging?  And what about random acts thrown in under the influence, acts you may not have agreed to prior, but now that you’re not thinking too clearly, well, shit goes to fuck?  Even worse, what about the idiots out here who deliberately use alcohol to get laid?  The moment alcohol is used to reduce or remove someone’s ability to make that decision, it’s no longer consensual sex, for the simple reason that they can’t consent, not with a clear mind.

For those of you still clinging to the idea of sex via intoxication, I read this analogy a few weeks back, if someone is too drunk to drive, you probably shouldn’t have sex with them.  Operating heavy machinery and such like.  Ahem.

Folks, I don’t know what else I can say at this point to convince you (them?) that sex is neither pointless sport nor competition.  That’s not to say sex can’t be playful (it should be), or that trying to win at sex is a bad thing (we all love prizes, no?), but our obsession with winning at all costs is detrimental to the quality of our sex lives.  Put differently, quality over quantity.  And quality for both parties involved, not just you and your own genitals.  How hard is it to understand that your lover’s pleasure should matter just as much as your own?  That your lover’s desires, or lack thereof, are as central to the sexual experience as your own?  That (great) sex is about getting naked, truly naked, sans bullshit and trickery, your own included?

I'm done bitching.  Be safe, be careful, be gentle with each other.

7.9.15

Love at first...shag?

I'm not often at a loss for words. I am often gobsmacked by unexpected brilliance, but that's the whole point of brilliance, to smack you across the face and make you sit up and take notice. That's not what I'm talking about.  I mean I am rarely struck dumb.  Come now, I have too much to say, on damn near everything, irrespective of whether or not I actually know anything about anything.  So you can imagine my surprise last week when a reply from Ann* left me speechless.  This is not an exaggeration, for the record, I truly had no response to what she said...

I asked:
My next question should then be, did you shag with him with the idea that it could possibly blossom (always wanted to say that) into a relationship, or was it simply a shag because you both wanted to and could? For the record, either answer is perfectly acceptable (\o/), I'm just trying to get a better idea of where your head is/was at. Did you talk about relationships prior to the shag?
She replied:
I prefer my hook ups to bloom into relationships. I have been accused of reversing the process, hookup-> relationship instead of relationship->hookup.
It took me three days to formulate a basic reply, in my head:
Eh?

And why, you ask, was I struck dumb?  If you've read any of my sewer tales you may have picked up on my, umm, aversion to looking for love in between the legs of another.  I've said it, many times, don’t have sex as a means to the end that is love.  So for me to find someone who is a firm believer in said practice here, on my front page no less...  It's like I stumbled upon a pink unicorn in my living room.  “What in the actual fuck?” I exclaimed, Katt Williams expression on my face.  Understand me, it's not that I object to this choice, whatever rocks your boat is my motto, no?  It's that I don’t understand how she ended up here, amongst the deviants looking for a good shag and not much else.

Eh?

Incidentally, how many more of you unicorns are out here lurking in my closets?  Reveal yourselves...  No really, reveal yourselves, I'm curious.  I am, really.  I won't give you a hard time, this is more of an educational head count, for me, she adds, looking away in what can only be described as a very suspicious manner.

Looking for some education
I made my way into the night
All that bullshit conversation
Baby can't you read the signs?
I won't bore you with the details baby
I don't even want to waste your time
Let's just say that maybe
You could help to ease my mind
Baby, I ain't Mr. Right

But if you're looking for fast love...

After a couple of days, the shock wore off and I got to thinking, perhaps I'm too jaded (I am, no?). What if casual sex really can lead to a meaningful relationship, love, happiness, all that stuff?  My first impression was this may be an age thing, where younglings shag first and stick around long enough to ask questions later, and the older you get the more hesitant you become, for a myriad of reasons.  That theory made sense for about two minutes, until I recalled having a conversation with someone older than me about their messy relationship with an idiot who was originally supposed to be just a one night stand.  It's clearly not an age thing.  My next theory was even better, it's that we've gotten more liberal, sexually, thus we're having more no strings sex even as we still look for strings.  Problem with this theory, if we're looking for strings, then doesn’t that mean the sex automatically is not no strings sex?  Put differently, if you have no strings sex, and then catch feelings and want the bloody strings, was the initial sex really sans strings?   Does it matter, in the grand scheme of things?  That, my lovelies, is today's 67 bob question.

I have to issue a disclaimer at this point and state my bias upfront: I think this is all bollocks.  Bollocks.  I'm writing this post with one eye, which is to say I'll be shaking my head vehemently, scoffing at the scientists and 'It worked for me!' essays I shall no doubt have to quote.  Wait, don’t click off in a huff just yet.  Inasmuch as I am not a believer, this is the one time I will be extremely happy to disabuse myself of a few misguided notions, if only so I can have more sex with new people, instead of wasting time on silly preliminaries like tedious questionnaires, plans and such.  There's also the possibility that I'll finally prove to all you unicorns (I see you...) once and for all that the horn thingi on your foreheads is an illusion.  Win/win either way, no?  Probably not.

Because I know there is that one genius smartass who'll rock up pale chini and start a discussion on the proper meaning of 'casual sex', definitions.

Wikipedia takes romance out of the equation:
Casual sex are certain types of sexual activity outside of romantic relationships that imply an absence of commitment, emotional attachment, or familiarity between sexual partners. Examples are sex in casual relationships, one-night stands, extramarital sex, prostitution, or swinging.
My problem with this definition is the absence of attachment or familiarity bit, because that implies that casual sex can only be had with a stranger.  Also, lumping one night stands and prostitution together is not helpful, but maybe that's just me.

Urban dictionary makes it simpler, as always:
Having sexual contact with another person with no plans on furthering a long term/committed relationship with that person.
Simple, no?  Sex without future plans.  Sounds about right.

Or not, as the lovely shrinks at Psychology Today explain:
Because human sexual behavior(sic) is so various, the phrase "casual sex" turns out to be a most treacherously roomy category. Casual sex" applies indiscriminately to one-night stands, playful sex with a friend-with-benefit's, exploratory sex with an acquaintance or roommate. It describes some sex between long-married couples, some open marriage encounters and masturbation (with or without porn or phone sex). It can be accurately applied to sex-junkets in colonized countries, adventures arranged on Web dating sites or swingers clubs...
(Random question, what the hell are 'sex-junkets in colonized countries'?  Every so often I suspect some of these wazungus I read are undeclared racists.  Don’t laugh at me, these buggers are devious, hiding their imperialist tendencies under a cloak of advanced knowledge.  That was a detour.)  The gist of that article is simple, your definition of casual sex depends almost entirely on your personal bias, which in turn means that what I consider casual sex may not be what you consider casual sex, which in turn means any definition I attempt here will be subject to lengthy discussion with aforementioned smartass in the comments section.  I know, the shrinks always complicate everything.

Casual sex is an umbrella term that encompasses many forms of sex that are similar in the fact that they do not involve committed relationships. This can include one night stands, friends with benefit's, and swinging. Other terms that are used to desribe(sic) casual sex are no strings attached sex and hooking up.
This is the definition I'm using today, from the sexy people over at Kinkly, sex minus commitment.  This covers everything from Friday night fungas to booty calls to Freddie Jackson 'Rock Me Tonight' sex with the ex to your biannual orgy with six of your closest friends; it's all casual, until flags are planted and declarations are made.  Yes?  Yes.

Now as it turns out, the term 'hook up' is not synonymous with casual sex. I assumed it was, but apparently the Americans who coined the phrase insist it isn’t.  From the earlier Wikipedia page:
A hookup (colloquial American English) is a casual sexual encounter involving physical pleasure without necessarily including emotional bonding or long-term commitment; it can range from kissing (for example, making out) to other sexual activities. Hooking up became a widespread practice among young people in the 1980s and 1990s. Researchers say that what differentiates hooking up from casual sex in previous generations of young people is the "virtual disappearance" of dating, which had been dominant from the postwar period onwards. Today, researchers say, casual sex rather than dating is the primary path for young people into having a relationship.
Where I assumed that the hook up meant no strings sex, and it sometimes does, it might be that same hook up is this generation's (I mean people in their teens/20's right now, the generation that grew up with FM radio, yaani, not me) way of getting to know someone, i.e. dating, but without the date.  

Yes, I can see my flawed theories beginning to tumble down.  Stop smirking.

Looking for some affirmation
I made my way into the sun
My friends got their ladies
They're all having babies
I just wannna have some fun
I won't bore you with the details baby
Gotta get there in your own sweet time
Let's just say that maybe
You could help to ease my mind
Baby, I ain't Mr. Right

But if you're looking for fast love...

Despite this definition, I can't help wondering if perhaps they've got it wrong.  Thing is, older people inevitably try to impart their own meaning when they don’t understand what's going on.  That's why all the magazines now have way too long articles on how 'hook-up culture' hurts young people, young women in particular, often along the lines of 9 Ways The Hook-Up Culture Is Ruining Love As We Know It (don’t bother with that list, unless you're sanctimonious and/or prudish).  It's not that us geriatrics oppose casual sex, or that we didn’t do it in our misguided youth, it's just that (cue melodramatic clutching of pearls) we think it's making these kids numb to real relationships (gasp!).

Shock on us oldies, then, when research shows us that:
Specifically, boomers had an average of 11 sexual partners as adults, whereas those born in the ’80s and ’90s had eight. Gen-Xers, who came in-between, had an average of 10 lays.
Yup, younglings are less freaky than my geriatric ass. Woobloodyhoo. Unrelated, this explains so much...
“If you’re the sort of person who likes casual sex, then having casual sex will probably make you feel better about things. If you're not, it won't.”
Sounds legit, no? Wait for the best bit...
Relationships that start with a spark and not much else aren't necessarily doomed from the get-go, new research suggests. Couples who became sexually involved as friends or acquaintances and were open to a serious relationship ended up just as happy as those who dated and waited.

I can see all my unicorns doing a wee dance of joy right now, smug rainbow-tailed bastards...

My people, turns out I've been wrong all along. You can find love in between the legs of another:
In an analysis of relationship surveys, UI sociologist Anthony Paik found that average relationship quality was higher for individuals who waited until things were serious to have sex compared to those who became sexually involved in "hookups," "friends with benefit's," or casual dating relationships. But having sex early on wasn't to blame for the disparity. When Paik factored out people who weren't interested in getting serious, he found no real difference in relationship quality. That is, couples who became sexually involved as friends or acquaintances and were open to a serious relationship ended up just as happy as those who dated and waited. [emphasis mine]

"We didn't see much evidence that relationships were lower quality because they started off as hookups," said Paik, an assistant professor in the UI College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. "The study suggests that rewarding relationships are possible for those who delay sex. But it's also possible for true love to emerge if things start off with a more 'Sex and the City' approach, when people spot each other across the room, become sexually involved and then build a relationship."

Before you start waxing romantic, read the fine print...
So if not the context of sexual involvement, what is behind the lower quality scores for relationships initiated as hookups? Paik points to selection: Certain people are prone to finding relationships unrewarding, and those individuals are more likely to form hookups.[emphasis mine]

"The question is whether it's the type of relationship that causes lower quality or whether it's the people," he said. "The finding is that it's something about the people."

People with higher numbers of past sexual partners were more likely to form hookups, and to report lower relationship quality. Through the acquisition of partners, Paik said, they begin to favor(sic) short-term relationships and find the long-term ones less rewarding. It's also likely that people who are predisposed to short-term relationships are screened out of serious ones because they don't invest the time and energy to develop long-term ties, Paik said.

What they're saying is the nature of the relationship depends on the people in said relationship. Sounds obvious, but it's not always that clear, is it?  Simply put, odds are either you or your casual partner, or both of you, are uninterested in commitment, which is how you ended up casually shagging to begin with.  Which means, there's no guarantee that casual sex will become anything more, not unless both parties are actively looking to get into something more meaningful.  I clarify this bit because it's often the cause of possibly the number one agony aunt question in this age of random shags, “I've fallen for my fuck buddy/friend with benefit's/no strings shag, what do I do?

But if you're looking for fast love
Fast love in your eyes
It's more than enough
Had some bad love
Some fast love is all that I've got on my mind...
I figure if anyone knows anything about casual sex, then it's George Michael.  One could even argue that he is intimately acquainted with the ins and outs of the random shag.  Ahem.  He also knows a fair share about unrequited love, and love that doesn’t work out as planned, if his music is anything to go by.
In the absence of security
I made my way into the night
Stupid cupid keeps on calling me
And I see nothing in his eyes...

Listen, I'm usually quite happy to take the scientists at their word, but not today.  If there's one thing I've learnt in this my peculiar life, it's that casual sex is just that, casual.  That doesn’t mean it's bad, or meaningless, or boring, or something to avoid, it's just casual.  Frankly, I think that's what makes it so good, when it is good.  (When it's bad it's always the twat's fault.  Default position unless proven otherwise, yes? Yes.)  Thing is, this is what works for me and my issues, so feel free to ignore me and do your own thing.  Can't hurt, can it?

Can you form a relationship from a random shag?  It would appear so.  Does it matter how the relationship began?  It would appear not.  Will said relationship last?  That's entirely up to you, my lovely little unicorn.

23.5.15

Introducing...Ann* (not her real name). And Tom Cruise* (not his real name either).

You know your reputation is in the toilet when someone sends you a tale of bad sex, unsolicited.  Why, you ask, would a lady feel compelled to do this?  That's exactly what I asked her, once I was done laughing.  She proceeded to point out the numerous tales of bad sex on this here blog, to which I responded, aha.  Ladies and gentlemen, my lovelies, this is now, officially, where (y)our bad sex comes to die.  It's bloody brilliant!  Or not, who knows?  Moving swiftly along.  This tale; it's short, it's not sweet, it is hilarious and it's oh so sad, but only for Tom Cruise*.  Ann, short for anonymous (she has no intention of sticking her name, real or imagined on this little piece of brilliance), is one of you silent lurker types who like to wander the corridors all stealthy like, apparently taking notes to use against me at a later date when I run for president (evil little buggers).  This is her contribution to the sewer, a refreshingly honest take on sex between consenting adults and all (well, some) of the perils that lie therein.  Don't be scared, this tale is neither crude nor rude (who knew it could be done this way?).  Enjoy, then dive into what I suspect may end up being quite the raucous conversation down below (my hand is already in the air, I have muchos questions...).

Disposing of...

So I rise to go pee and in my toilet bowl, there is a used condom staring back at me. I am stunned. No, not at the condom, but at the location. Who, in their right mind, disposes of a condom in the toilet? Well, at least he didn’t flush the toilet so it is easy to wear a plastic bag, and dispose it properly. Oh wait, this hits me that he didn’t flush the toilet! Now I am wondering which is worse... is he one of those people who don’t flush the toilet after peeing? But at least the non-flushing will not lead to a clogged up pipe system in the future... So why did he just leave it there, like seriously, where does he expect it to go? Sigh. There is so much to teach this guy, I thought he was a man, but it just hit me he is a boy.

Wait, I just got a flashback. We have been walking the corridors of the workplace, and sometimes he pops into the gent’s and each time he comes out, his hands are completely dry. Which is odd because our hand driers take forever to work; there are no paper towels to be seen around! What a pet peeve! A non-flusher and non-hand washer... I should have known, but perhaps lust, like love, is like wool over the eyes of the beholder. I should have known he was a boy and not a man!

Okay this post is now becoming bad poetry so let us get to the crux of the matter. After all the preliminaries had been set aside, we set a date and time. My place. We had dinner that I had made. We started making out. The kissing wasn’t too bad, but you could tell he has been watching too many movies because, ladies and gentlemen, kisses shouldn’t start all at once unless you were out somewhere building it up and the passion is bridling. But from a banal dinner (there were no candles or such), the tension should be allowed to build. Our movie star firmly planted his mouth on mine and we could hardly breathe. Naturally matters progressed to the bed where you think, okay, slow down, but no, the scene has to act out like in a movie, clothes are being pulled off faster than the speed of light. I tried to put away my glasses safely on the table, but Tom Cruise was having none of that, on the floor they went (he, later on, stepped on them on the way to un-flush the condom). The lady received one lick of a nipple and that was all that counted as the foreplay, before our hero swiftly wore the said condom and in the same manner proceeded to thrust for at most 4 minutes. I thought he had stopped to, you know, change position or something, but no, it was over.

I guess it is partly my fault too, I should have taken control, slowed Tom Cruise down, showed him how it is done. He has potential, I think, but I don’t feel like teaching a man who is around 30 the basics of sex (you can’t learn these things from movies guys, the movies are edited!). However, I am still recovering from the trauma of a condom in the toilet, unwashed hands (I picture crawlies on unwashed hands, is it just me?), movie-star tendencies of breathless kissing and flying clothes, consequently, shattered glasses (do you know how much a decent pair of spectacles cost?), and worst of all, I still can’t get the question of “Hii ni nini?” in response to the salad that I served, the man has never had raw vegetables. Gosh, I thought that we are now all beyond the village ways and into the world of sophisticated dining, Caesar's salads et al? This is where you just ask, kai ni kii?

From now on, the get to know phase will include questions like, do you know what salad is? How do you dispose a condom? I need someone to help me wrap it all into diplomatic language. Suffice to say, there were no sleepovers that day. This post (This is about (bad) sex) should all make us better lovers, I hope. Happy sexing ladies and gentlemen.

30.12.14

Oral Fixation: Don't dick around.

It occurs to me that we never actually got round to talking about sucking bones, last time around, probably because I am a selfish woman more concerned with getting my own pleasure, rather than serving up yet another unnecessary instruction manual on how to get your man off.  Let's face it, the last thing this world needs is another how to suck a dick article, yes?  No, there is always room for another one.  Because it's December, and I am nothing if not generous in December (stop grumbling, I know I've been lazy...), I thought why not?  Why not indeed...

I went off in search of the how and why of a good blow job, but one hour in I realised it was not particularly helpful.  We've all read the Cosmopolitan 'How To Give A Blow Job' article (fun fact: it's a collection of articles, because they keep adding new improved tips. Nkt!), surely by now the basics are sorted...
  1. insert penis in mouth.
  2. suck on penis.
  3. do not bite penis.
  4. stare deeply into his eyes as you suck; or use both hands to rub his shaft as you suck; or use one hand to rub his shaft as you rub his balls/ass/thighs/hips/nipples with the other hand, while staring deeply into his eyes, while you suck; or stick a doughnut on his dick and nibble away, as you suck, and rub, and stare deeply; or suck, rub, stare, and play with yourself; or do all of the above in front of a mirror.
  5. be sure to tell him whether you want him to come in your mouth, or on your face, or on your breasts
  6. rinse, repeat
Hands up if you found this cosmo-type sex education not even remotely useful.  Both my hands are up right now.  It's complete bollocks, no?  It's not that I object to the always useful suggestion to use my hands, or breasts, or in one troubling instance my feet, it's that I object to the idea that I have such tremendous balance that I can kneel over a man with my head in his crotch, bobbing said head up and down, and yet somehow find a way to reach up and grab his non-existent boob, while staring deeply into his eyes.  What the hell do I look like, that stretchy geezer from Fantastic Four?  See, this is how people get hurt in bed, doing all manner of silly things the magazines tell them to, because we know no better.  Nkt!

What you need to be buying, all ye in search of sex advice, is the original 'sex' manual.  Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you for your orgasmic amusement, the The Kama Sutra of Vatsyayana.  Cue sound of heavens opening.  Or not, the book does have a tendency to wander into the downright peculiar, but in its defence, it's old, really old.  The Kama Sutra has possibly every sexual act you can think of, described in lurid (and sometimes florid) detail, and because life isn’t just about sex, they have equally detailed sections on courtship, marriage and courtesans.  Yes, courtesans. (Do you think we should have a discussion on what appears to be the important place, in society, of women willing to have sex for a fee? Maybe not.)  There's also an intriguing chapter at the end, Of The Ways Of Exciting Desire, And Miscellaneous Experiments, And Recipes, that describes, among many other things, how to augment any penile, umm, shortcomings a man may suffer from...

When a man wishes to enlarge his lingam, he should rub it with the bristles of certain insects that live in trees, and then, after rubbing it for ten nights with oils, he should again rub it with the bristles as before. By continuing to do this a swelling will be gradually produced in the lingam, and he should then lie on a cot, and cause his lingam to hang down through a hole in the cot. After this he should take away all the pain from the swelling by using cool concoctions. The swelling, which is called 'Suka', and is often brought about among the people of the Dravida country, lasts for life.

Is your mouth open right now?  Read the whole page.  It is, hands down, the scariest shit I have read all year, and that's saying something, no?  Yes.  Bless their little Indian hearts, these buggers were suitably deviant, a deviancy I can only ascribe to the absence of TV to distract them from higher pursuits.  Don’t laugh, think about how much of our lives we waste in front of random screens.  Now imagine if we spent that time on more productive pursuits, inventing wondrous flying machines and shit.  You're not convinced, are you?  You're shaking your head, aren’t you?  Read it all and tell me you could write it, without taking a break every two hours to check if the bloody plane has been found.  I didn’t think so.

It goes without saying that the Kama Sutra has a section on blow jobs, or as they call it, mouth congress.  Stop laughing.  Before I link to this page I have to issue a stern warning: if you are in any way bothered by the idea of a penis in the mouth of another man, DO NOT GO THERE.  It would appear that mouth congress was considered a 'low practice, and opposed to the orders of the Holy Writ', and thus suitable only for eunuchs, and unchaste women. I am not making this shit up.  Assuming you have overcome any homophobic tendencies you may have lurking...who am I kidding, at this point it's only women reading...'Of The Auparishtaka Or Mouth Congress' describes eight steps to the blow...
  1. The nominal congress
  2. Biting the sides
  3. Pressing outside
  4. Pressing inside
  5. Kissing
  6. Rubbing
  7. Sucking a mango fruit
  8. Swallowing up
As tempting as it is to paste the explanations, I shall spare the gentlemen their blushes and let those who are curious read it for themselves.  Gentlemen, if any of you is willing to be my lab rat (hey, Woolie), feel free to comment on this technique hapo chini.  One thing I would like to point out is the complete absence of bullshit tricks and stunts, other than a cursory note at the end, 'Striking, scratching, and other things may also be done during this kind of congress.'  Now I'm not saying tricks and stunts are not required, I'm just saying if these freaky buggers didn’t see the need for them, then perhaps there's no need for them, no?  No?

You like the tricks, don't you?  Useless buggers...

From a woman then, the excellent Voluptuous Voltarian over at Adventures, 'How To Lick The Lollipop'...

There a bunch of techniques online that you can look up but in my opinion the biggest teacher you have is the dick you are blowing. As you lick your lollipop see if the reaction you are getting from the man is favourable. Spread his thighs further apart so you have more room to manoeuvre. Stroke his thighs and rake your nails lightly across them till you reach his hips. Grab his butt. Fondle his balls. Suck one ball while you stroke the other and then switch it up. Vary techniques and pay attention to his reaction. Allow him to guide you.

See?  There are no tricks to this.

Or perhaps there are. From my favourite shrinks, Secrets of Fabulous Fellatio, a scientific how to guide, with glans and ef'thing.  (It bothers me how happy this fancy lingo nonsense makes me, but that's a story for another day.)

The Fine Points
Alternate sucking with licking the head and shaft.
Flick your tongue rapidly around the head.
Lick or nibble the scrotum.
Stroke the shaft with one or both hands while sucking or licking the head.
Fondle the scrotum while sucking.
Gently squeeze the head or shaft between your thumb and forefinger.
Gently slap his erection against your lips or outstretched tongue.
While providing fellatio, massage him elsewhere. Some men enjoy anal sphincter massage during fellatio. Others like being anally fingered—use plenty of lubrican't, and trim that finger’s nail.
Finally, if providing fellatio gives you pleasure, say so. Most men get turned on knowing that their lovers enjoy giving head.

That last point, that's what this post is about.

In my brilliance, last week I decided to ask some men some slightly awkward questions about blow jobs, and the answers I got were nothing short of a mind fuck.  I went into these conversations with a few pre-set notions in my head.  Assumption 1: men love blow jobs.  Assumption 2: men demand blow jobs.  Assumption 3: women give blow jobs. I was wrong on all three counts.  For the record, all the men I spoke were suitably deviant buggers, all four of them.

Ladies, did you know that men may not be as enthralled with blow jobs as we think they are?  Half the men said it wasn’t key to their sex, 'nice, but not important' was one response, 'a dispensable appendage to the entire process' said the other.  I was gobsmacked.  Smacked.  On my gob.  All along I just assumed all men just have to have their dicks sucked, and this despite having shagged a couple of men who didn’t care for it (I assumed they were anomalies).  The idea that a man's reaction to a blow job would be a...shrug?  I never.  I blame the shitty porn I've watched, all porn starts off with a dick in a mouth. Well, except lesbian porn, obviously.  Seriously though, there is a general assumption out here that all men love to get their dicks sucked, right?  Gentlemen, it's in all our silly magazines and the pseudo porn that passes for entertainment, and all the 'how to spice up your sex life' tips make a point of instructing women on the finer points (see above).  And then it turns out this is a myth?  This is the oddest thing, but there you have it.

The next revelation was even more of a mind fuck.  Men don’t ask for, or demand, blow jobs.  A few weeks back I talked about never asking a man to go down on me, and the reactions I got echoed my sentiments.  Turns out men are the exactly the same.  Not one of the men I spoke to asks for head, they all take it as it comes, if it comes.  Remember, these are sexually confident buggers, tending towards the freaky end of the spectrum.  I can understand the ones who don’t go gaga for the gagging not asking, it's not important to them.  Thing is, even the one guy who said he loves blow jobs as much as, if not more, sex (dick in vagina), said he never, ever asks.  There was an odd reluctance here, part of it is the assumption women don’t like to give head, part is the reluctance/fear of getting bad head, once bitten, and all that (pun wholly intended).  Incidentally, contrary to my belief that men hate it, three of the four men are happy to eat their women out, for no other reason than they know their women enjoy it.  One lovely gentleman said, 'If cunnilingus is customer service, heck, I will give good customer service.'  Ahem. Sorry.  Amen.  I made a mental note to continue that conversation with him at a later date, at length.

The last revelation?  Turns out women generally don’t give blow jobs.  I got numbers ranging from as low as 'only a few' to 50%, which by my rudimentary mathafus puts the average at about 30%.  I was expecting responses in the 90% region, to be honest, hence my mind fuck moment.  I assumed that women give blow jobs because it's been drummed into our heads that satisfying the man is the most important thing, and because men allegedly love blow jobs, then surely women must be giving loads of them, no?  No.  Ladies, if you have ever had a moment of doubt, wondering if you need to get past whatever hang up you have, be easy, not too many women are doing it, despite what the likes of Cosmo say.  And he probably doesn’t need you to, apparently.  Turns out, oral sex is not nearly as important as I thought it was, and this bothers me deeply.  How now?  It's so bloody intimate I truly can't imagine sex without it. Or is that why it's not too popular, because of how intimate it is?  Then again, some people consider it impersonal, probably because they think it taboo, dirty.  I don’t get it.

Usually I write to work something out, find some answers, get some sort of resolution. But not tonight.  Tonight I'm left with that unsettled feeling in the pit of my stomach, the feeling I get when I haven’t figured shit out, or when I don’t like the answers I've dug up.  My lovelies, what the fuck are we doing in bed?  This nonsense of not asking...or the idea that some things are too taboo to talk about...  Do we talk to each other when we have sex?  I mean really talk?  Or do we just rub genitals and get each other off?

We need to stop dicking around, man.


12.12.14

Oral Fixation.

You've been wondering how you can make it better?
Baby, it's easy to turn my world inside out
Your discovery will take us to another place
Baby, on that, there is no doubt

I've been waiting for the special moment
Anticipating all the things you'll do to me
Make the first step to release my emotions
To take the road to ecstasy...

My childhood innocence is officially dead and gone, buried 6 feet deep in a grave of misunderstood lyrics.  What the hell was I singing when I was a teenager?  Did you know SWV were singing about...  Let me get into this story first, then we'll revisit these women.

I feel like getting suitably filthy today, only I have nothing to get filthy about.  In the three years I've being doing this blogging thing, we've talked about pretty much everything sex related.  No really, every fucking thing.  It all began, quite harmlessly, with a plea for all the good men and women of my city to get their freak on, followed swiftly by a plea for all married people to get their freak on, ideally with their significant others, instead of whining about it in the bar, to me.  I railed against the funga revolution and bad sex, and made an excellent case for shagging the exes and shagging yourself.  We talked about mind fucks and booty calls (which just for the record are still the complete opposite of mind fucks), 'grown ass woman' sex and 'waking up in the morning' man sex.  I tried to convince you to have Christmas flings and quickies, and, when that didn’t work, I did a handy list of 10 things your mother never told you about sex.  I've waxed poetic about the first time you shag someone and the questions you need to ask before you do.  I liberated myself from the shackles of sexual propriety (and got ridiculed for it) and showed you deviant buggers the sewers in your own damn minds (you really shouldn’t have ridiculed me).  We talked about orgasms, at length, and then we talked about dick size, just because we could.  And then we talked about porn, a lot of porn, suspect erotica even, plus a how to guide for aspiring pornographers.  You ignored my threesome story, and my kissing story, and judging by the nonsense I continue to read online, nobody paid any attention to the science I researched (and debunked) oh so lovingly.  On the up side, seems we all quite enjoyed the happy discovery that women make women come more, or better, or both.  Do you see what I mean when I say we've talked about everything?

I suspect I have sucked this bloody bone dry.

Hang on...

She stares at that line again.

Folks, let's talk about sucking bones (and other) dry.  Yes, really.  Come on, we've done everything else, no?  

Detour.  Did you see how I did that?  Smooth, no?  I've just managed to concoct an almost plausible excuse to talk about licking a clitoris, and this while I took you through my disturbingly extensive sex archive.  I know, I'm very clever.  Detour over.

My lovelies, I want to have a discussion about Kenyan men and their seeming reluctance to eat their women out.  I want to have a discussion about Kenyan women and our love for oral sex, and our reluctance to ask for, or demand, or expect it.  I want to have a discussion about putting genitals in your mouth for pleasure, and why some seem to derive no pleasure from it.  I want to know why men go down on you the first time you shag, and they do so extremely well, and then turn around and act like its some Christmas festivity immediately thereafter, to be engaged in no more than once a year (true story by the way, but we'll get to that later).  I want to know if there's a particular way a woman, or man, should taste, or if we're all different flavours.  Stop laughing, that last one's not as idiotic as it sounds, all blood tastes the same, yes?  Stands to reason that all other body fluids do too, no?  No, it still sounds idiotic, but I will still explore, dammit, because I can.  Ladies and gentlemen, it’s finally time to talk about cunnilingus.

First up, a couple of definitions.

Cunnilingus:
Oral stimulation of the vaginal lips and clitoris by a partner of either sex for pleasure or for orgasm . CAUTION: Oral sex between disease-free people is not risky. Although oral-sex was, until recently, considered a low risk activity for getting HIV (USA Today (Feb. 2, 2000) a recent study shows that as many as 8% of new HIV infections in gay men result from performing oral sex) other STDs such as syphilis , gonorrhea , herpes 2 that can be transmitted orally. Since HIV may be contained in the seminal and vaginal fluids of an HIV-infected person, protection in the form of a latex-condom with spermicide (preferably nonoxynol-9) is recommended for fellatio and a dental-dam or latex barrier should be used for cunnilingus . It isn't easy for HIV to get-into the bloodstream through the mouth unless that the mouth contains cuts, sores, or recent dental work . No cases have been reported yet of people being infected with HIV by having oral-sex performed on them.
Etymology: Latin for vulva licker, from cunnus, the vulva, and lingus, the tongue or lingere, to lick .

Stimulation of the penis with the lips, tongue and mouth by a male or female partner for sexual pleasure or for orgasm and ejaculation . A distinction, now obsolete, was once made in Latin and old English between fellatio and irrumatio depending on who was actively moving: irrumatio meant to thrust the penis into the partner's mouth , fellatio meant to move the head and mouth up-and-down around the penis. This distinction has vanished in modern English and the word irrumation has almost completely fallen out of use.
Etymology: From the Latin fellâtus, past participle of fellâre, to suck, and fello, originally meaning to suck the teat .

Not to get too political about this, but do you see how the two definitions differ?  Cunnilingus, oral sex on a woman, comes with a stern warning about disease.  Disease!  They even threw in gay men, because gay men engage in copious quantities of pussy eating, right?  In contrast, the fellatio definition is quite detailed, including a most illuminating explanation on irrumation (I am so using that on a man one day, 'Stop irummating me, baibee!' I will exclaim, as I push him off my face.  Oh my...).  Note the complete lack of health warnings, or complimentary lesbians, when it comes to sucking a dick.  Pardon my French, but what the fuck kinda bullshit is this?  Problem is, this sexist approach to pleasure is constant these days, everything from porn to daytime TV is skewed towards male pleasure.  But not here, no sirree bob.  Here women's pleasure is equal to, perhaps even greater than, men's pleasure.

To Wikipedia then, for a less biased (read, bullshit) definition of oral sex:

Oral sex or oral intercourse is sexual activity involving the stimulation of the genitalia of a person by another person using the mouth (including the lips, tongue or teeth) or throat. Cunnilingus is oral sex performed on a female, while fellatio is oral sex performed on a male. Anilingus, another form of oral sex, is oral stimulation of a person's anus. Oral stimulation of other parts of the body (as in kissing and licking) is usually not considered oral sex.

Oral sex may be performed as foreplay to incite sexual arousal before other sexual activities (such as vaginal or anal intercourse), or as an erotic and physically intimate act in its own right.

Most of us already know what oral sex is, the problem normally arising with the how, and maybe the why.  Gentlemen, I don’t know how to tell you this except to tell it to you straight.  Cunnilingus is the way to (many) a woman's heaven.  Last year we talked about the omnipresent statistic, that only 1 in 3 women orgasm from penetration alone.  What this means is the other 2 women require stimulation of their clitoris to come, which in turn means you will be eating her out.  Yes, you can use your fingers, but be honest, how many of you know how to use your fingers that well?  Thought so.  Your mouth, especially your tongue is best suited to this little exercise.  So then, how do you give your lover oral pleasure?  Is there a handy 10-point guide to sucking on the strawberry and sipping on her wine?

In one of the stranger discoveries of my evening, I found this information on Wikipedia of all places...

Some sex manuals recommend beginning with a gentler, less focused stimulation of the labia and the whole genital area. The tip, blade, or underside of the tongue may be used, and so might the nose, chin, teeth and lips. Movements can be slow or fast, regular or erratic, firm or soft, according to the participants' preferences. The tongue can be inserted into the vagina, either stiffened or moving. The performing partner may also hum to produce vibration.

And they say wikipedia is boring. Pffft! Clearly they haven’t set eyes on the useful illustration at the top of the page, of a woman eating another woman out. (Sidebar: I'm not sure if that's sexist or not, using two women like that, seems a tad gratuitous that display of lesbian activity.  Then again, I'm not sure any image is necessary so...)  Mind you, they also threw in this little gem:

Autocunnilingus, which is cunnilingus performed by a female on herself, may be possible, but an unusually high degree of flexibility is required, which may be possessed only by contortionists.

If wishes were horses, my lovelies, I would never leave the damn house ever again.  For what?

Seriously though, there is no shortage of how to articles online, most admittedly absurd, like this one which advises men to make like Ali... 

One of my favorite tongue techniques that I talk about in my book 'She Comes First' is the “Rope-a-dope”— the strategy Muhammad Ali used to take down George Foreman during the edge-of your-seat Rumble in the Jungle. Let her push and grind against your flat, still tongue — take it all in — and then spring back with a series of fast vertical and diagonal tongue strokes. Lick her senseless with a short burst of energy and then return to the flat, still tongue, waiting for yet another opportune moment to spring to life again.

Spring back? What the fuck is this, hunting? Gentlemen, do not try this at home. No really, don’t. You leave your tongue still and she'll think you've finished, and not in a good way. Besides, what's the point of getting a man to eat you out if he won't actually eat, no? I just got virtual high fives from the female half of my audience. 

 If you want a useful guide look for one written by women, like this one, Cunnilingus 101: Our Guide To Going Down, it has a drawing and ef'thing, and a handy list:

Dos & Don’t’s
1.  Do change the strength and intensity of your strokes, to vary her sensations!
2.  Don’t change them when she’s close to coming!
3.  Do show enthusiasm and give positive reinforcement after!
4.  Don’t get so lost in your own enjoyment that you miss her cues.
5.  Do use your hands and whole face when pleasuring her.
6.  Don’t come to bed with jagged fingernails or beard stubble.
7.  Do keep licking as she’s coming.
8.  Don’t stop until she pushes you away or signals that she’s had enough.
9.  Do use the heat of your breath to excite her.
10. Don’t blow into her vagina.

Also good, if somewhat more opinionated, is this, The Lesbian Guide To Eating Pussy (Every Man Must Read).

Men suck at eating pussy. Not because they don’t like it but because it is really fucking hard. You have to learn it. Giving good head is the key to just about everything in life (including getting good head later on), so it’s time we broke it down. Like this.

The secret to giving good head is to read the signs. You could be the best sexual mechanic in the world, but if you can’t read the emotional road signs, you’re going to end up wandering around in a desolate labial wasteland until, eventually, you drop from exhaustion, hot tears of confusion streaming down your face. Think of eating the puss as your way of saying, “Although I am about to rock your insides with 3,000 pounds of explosives, here’s a little treat session to show you how I really feel.” Instead of a screamed “OH MY GOD!!” like her baby has been trapped under a car (which is what fucking should do), cunnilingus elicits a more splendiferous “ohmygodohmygodohmygod.” Kind of like being massaged with exotic fruits by a muscular Arab oil sheik. A good mange (that’s French for “eat,” you brutes) is like a thousand years of Saturdays or a “Calgon, take me away” ad.

I have no idea what a Calgon is, but Kai Ni Kii? approves of this message.  Feel free to thank me later.

Keep on doing, doing what you're doing
'Til you feel the passion burning up inside of me
If you do me right, we'll be making love all through the night
Until you uncover the mystery

Take it nice and slow, baby, don't rush the feeling
Now you know how you can make it happen, yeah
My desire is begging for the healing
Let me guide you down to the place to be...

Which brings me to the crux of the matter.  For all the information out here on how to pleasure a woman, they don’t tell us much about women who don’t like to be pleasured, and women who don’t like to ask to be pleasured.  Most women I know fall in the second category.  Wait, maybe that’s just me.  For some reason I never ask for oral sex.  I gladly give it, but never think to demand it, and the best part of this mess is this, I then resent the man for not giving it.  I really do.  I figure, if a man enjoys getting his dick sucked, how does it not occur to him that I would enjoy the same?  No, I don’t have a dick, but my clit has many, many more nerve endings than your bloody cock, so do the fucking maths.  Bloody nkt!  Why then do I not say anything?  Because in my head I'm convinced most men don’t like to do it, and I'm a firm believer in not forcing someone to do anything they don’t want to do.  Plus, I refuse to beg.  That’s right, I am too proud to beg.  Shame man.  How is it a freaky little creature like me hesitates when it comes to my own pleasure?

Turns out I'm not the only one.

As always, my interest in this particular topic was ignited by a suitably inflammatory article (read, click bait).  Why do so many straight women prefer penetration to oral sex?  Watch this video, Straight Girls Explain : Penetration Vs Oral, the subject of the article, and tell me if anything these (admittedly young and white) women say resonates with you.

It would appear our reticence when it comes to oral sex may have less to do with men and more to do with our own body cum sex issues.  Do you think you smell/taste a little funky?  Do you think your hoohaa isn’t pretty enough?  Are you flustered by the thought of a man getting that close to your womanhood, and by association your nudity?  Or do you simply think putting genitals in mouths is nasty?  Ladies, whatever thoughts you have regarding your lady bits, good and bad, I assure you there is another woman somewhere who thinks the exact same way.  A lifetime of being brought up 'proper' has left us with a most Presbyterian approach, where Presbyterian means repressed (no offence to any Presbyterian here), to our sexuality.  Again, maybe this is just me, but I’m willing to wager its not.  The unfortunate reality of our conservative upbringing is many, possibly most, women have been conditioned to think of their own pleasure as secondary to their man's, and that their vaginas are evil honey pots of sin that are never to be seen or touched, let alone heard.  Yes, your vagina has a voice, who do you think tells you to chase after that hot man when you damn well know you shouldn't?  This is probably the one thing men will never understand about us, this love hate relationship we have with our loins.  The good news is, because here at Kai Ni Kii? we always have good news, this conditioning can be overcome.  The bad news is, I'm not entirely sure how.  

Don't look at me like that, I'm still in the basic process of working up the courage to ask for some tongue, but at least these days I no longer worry about smelling/tasting iffy.  A shower before a shag works wonders for my confidence, I've found.  

It's a miracle I get somehow laid even after writing this shit.  Moving right along.

As part of my annual 'give something back to the community in December' sex outreach programme, I would like to dispel this one myth.  Ladies, men love oral sex just as much as we do, giving and receiving.  As for why they ration it like Christmas, I have no idea, but I'm guessing it has something to do with laziness, and perhaps the fact that we don't make it a requirement.  Fortunately for women, we always have the option of replacing him with another, more eager, lover.  What’s that?  But you love him?  Well then, you might want to share this post with him, all subtle like.  Or play him this song...

You gotta go downtown
That's the way to my love
Take it round and round
Oooh, you can't stop 'til you find my love
Go downtown, to taste the sweetness will be enough
That's the love that you've been dreamin' of...

The song is 'Downtown' by SWV, an ode to...you guessed it...going down on a woman.  Now when I say ode, I mean ode.  There is nothing else to this song other than eating her, them, out.  And I didn’t have a clue until about one hour ago.  I was singing along to this song way back when I was in high school, none the wiser.  And not because I was an idiot, watch the video and see for yourself.  Does anything there lead you to think it has anything whatsoever to do with oral sex?  Wait.  Hmm...  There's a shirtless man kneeling in front of her with his head in her crotch area...water cascading down...a man's strong fingers on a tight drum...  I get it now, completely about oral sex.

Dammit.

24.9.14

Introducing...Savvy!

This post is fucking hilarious.  I had to say it, upfront.  I'm itching to let you get on with it, but before you do I must introduce my most illustrious guest.  Ladies and gentlemen, meet Ms Savvy, recent inhabitant of the comments section here in our little corner of the interwebs.  She's a blogger of many years (Savvy Kenya), hell, she's pretty much blog royalty in my book.  She's a techie, mother, AFC fan, writer, new car owner (just saying)...  Have I left anything out?  Ah yes, she's off to Japan in a few days to get herself a second MSc in Artificial Intelligence and such like, because one MSc is just never enough, is it?  She's sharp, is all I'm saying, in both mind and wit.  And she has a wee fondness for our little sewer.  Which brings me to this post...for real, I’m so excited I'm clapping, while I type...my lovelies, there is nothing better than an intelligent woman who can talk smut, smart, as you shall soon discover.

As always the disclaimer. This is a tale from the sewer and therefore it will be both rude (but only slightly) and crude (maybe slightly more), but, and I don’t often get to say this here, in a very good way. If you blush at the mention of porn, you might want to leave now...

How to make (good) pornography.

On Sundays, Kenyans on twitter are rather idle, and there is always something brewing. Nothing ever serious though, just trivial things blown out of proportion for the entertainment of us, idle tweeps. Like recently, there was talk of 37 million shillings. A chick had turned down 37M in return for her phone number! If someone offered me 37M for my phone number, I’d even draw them a map to my shagz. Everyone on my timeline was wondering how that was possible, they were all fantasizing about what they could do with 37M if they got it. Sadly, nothing imaginative though, beyond buying land and maybe some ugly Range Rover (I am seriously digressing, Alex-style, but hear me out). I am always curious and rarely jump into discussions without knowing their origins. I found the original tweet and it went like, “A dude last night was trying to impress me into giving him my number be saying he sealed a deal of 37 million.” Now I understand, I also wouldn’t give such a person my number! He was probably just a broker and his cut could be 37K only. Wealthy people don’t talk about their money. Which reminds, there was the time I thought had met a rich politician, a guy who talked about money on the very first time we met accidentally. So much for the shopping trips to London & Paris, nkt! Now a girl has to go and make her own money, SMH.

Back to the topic at hand, enough of the detour. On another idle Sunday, I stumbled on people talking about a Florence Wambui. I immediately did a search on twitter for the name. I stumbled on the original account, describing herself as “Kenya’s Most Famous Porn Star” and “Queen of Anal” or something along those lines. I didn’t bother with the tweets, they weren’t likely to be witty anyway. I started scrolling through the pics, and my oh my! Gross & grotesque pictures of her licking some not-so-good-looking pale dick, pictures of her getting some dick anally (she insists you must use a condom if anal), blurry pictures in lodgings (likely those that have different coloured slippers), and a few pictures of her in clothes. Pictures of her with cum on her face (how the fuck is this sexy? Sorry digressing again). And so on, and so forth. She looks way better in clothes than without.

So my tweet on the topic was something like “Florence Wambui: Now I cannot unsee what I just saw”. And Alex responded that she thought the porn pics were of rather poor quality. I agreed 100%. Not that I am a big consumer of porn, but I don’t have to be an expert to tell you that porn pics should hold your attention in a positive way, should at least be a contributing factor in turning you on, rather than be a big turn off. They’re there to whet your appetite, not to make you lose it. So here I am writing a guide for good porn (pics).

First of all, sexual organs, dicks & pussies, are decidedly unsexy (this post should come with a caveat for family unfriendly language haha). They rarely look good on camera. Which is why a combination of Brazilian waxing, makeup, photoshop and video graphics are vital when taking and publishing porn pics online. The angle of taking the picture, the lighting, the mood (hehe) all have to contribute in making everything as attractive as inhumanly-possible. Same goes for the supporting body parts, thighs, arms, faces etc. Waxing. Make up. Photoshop. Video enhancing graphics. Surgically enhance body parts if necessary. For everyone who will appear in the picture/video. This leads me to the second tip of the guide.

The camera and lighting is everything. When the subject is coated in enough make up, under a very good camera, anyone can create that fantasy image popular in porn. Don’t take photos with your Nokia Asha and upload them unedited. If you’re going to be Kenya’s number porn star, please put some effort into it. I see it with our “socialities”, for example see Huddah’s latest hoodie photos. Get a good camera, those with lenses you can replace. Then get a good set of lights. I am not a good photographer, I am not even a poor photographer; but these are the basics, everybody knows it. You cannot make a porno without investing in a good camera, a set of lights and those reflector things. Fine, let’s say you have a high end phone, like my current phone with 13MP (but do I say). In good natural lighting, it can take some very nice pics. There might come (sic) a moment when you don’t have your camera and have to take the picture with your phone. This is where filters come in. Instagram has filters. Pixer-or-matic is another app full of good filters. Make good use of them to mask the imperfect, enhance the good features and create the fantasy. And come to think of it, you should really not be taking spontaneous pics, rather pose every moment to perfection. How else will you get people to buy your porn?

I am going to take a break here to rant a bit. Porn is fantasy. They have made things like cumming in someone’s eye(!) or anal sex (for women) attractive. I think all it does is make your asshole loose and sooner rather than later you may have to wear adult diapers. Anal is just not my thing (sorry Flo!) but I think her target audience is sex pests tourists. Someone explained to me the pleasure in anal sex for men, something about the prostrate being rubbed and you feel good. If you’re a man reading this, and have had your prostrate checked, is it true? But anyway, porn caters to people’s fantasies, be it dick-milking machines or horses or whatever. Just don’t try that shit in real life. Haha… Okay, back to my last point on this guide.

I can’t say I have watched local porn, but it exists. Luo, Kikuyu porn. In campus, there is a dude who had Kyuk porn on his flash disk but he deleted it before I could watch. Nothing as wrong as hearing sex talk in your mother tongue, but maybe that’s just me. So I am not sure if they have such a thing as concept, plot or storyline. Since porn = fantasy (I am glad we agree on this point), then create the fantasy, act out the part, and deliver. Find the perfect location, or create the backdrops and props so required. A good camera, good lighting. The storyline: school girl & teacher, MILF, best friends, etc. Of course when all is said and done, it basically gets down to the mashing of body parts together and we go back to point #1. Makeup for the bodies to be flawless, evenly toned, and very attractive.

Oh, Kenyans reported the original Florence Wambui account and it got suspended, but she resurfaced with another account, just search the name you may find it on twitter. She wants to be president in 2017, I guess following in the footsteps of Kingwa Kamencu, who released some nudes recently. I think I have surpassed the word count limit, let me stop here.

2.9.14

Women do it better. Yes, that it. Really, they do.

I've got the problem
You got the solvin
Baby...

When one opens one’s news reader on a random Wednesday morning to find this headline, “Lesbians Are Having More Orgasms Than Straight Women”, one can either take it as a sign from the universe to start shagging women, or as a sign to get back to one’s blog.  It could also be a sign that I need to stop relying on suspect sites like HuffPo for my daily news, but in my defence, I’m in the middle of a pseudo Mexican stand-off with our dailies (I mean a boycott, of sorts, but only on my end it would seem) and I must have my daily dose of nonsense, but I digress.  So this article went ahead to inform me that the results of a recent study show:
While heterosexual women reported orgasming 61.6 percent of the time and bisexual women reported 58 percent, lesbian women had the highest orgasm rate at 74.7 percent.
And because that isn’t sad enough for heterosexual women, there’s this:
…heterosexual men reported an 85.5 percent orgasm rate, gay men 84.7 percent, and bisexual men 77.6 percent…

And there you have it, my lovelies, the scientists have spoken. 62% means for every five times a heterosexual woman has sex, she orgasms during only three of those sessions.  Quick question, what happens to her the other two times?  Does she sigh contentedly enjoying her almost come, comforting herself with the knowledge that the next one will be better, statistically?  Or does she harangue her man for not delivering?  Or does she wait until he falls asleep to get herself off?  Or does she resign herself to dissatisfaction and drift off to blue-ball (read, clit) sleep?  I’m curious, ladies, what do you do when this happens?  I’d ask the gentlemen, but you buggers reported 86%, that’s 4 in 5 times, 4.3 in 5 to be precise, which means there’s at least one time you got off and she didn’t, you selfish bastard.  What?  It’s either that or there is a significant number of guys who just don’t get it, ever, about 38% of you. Kidding.  Or not.

But wait a minute, based on these numbers, are they saying women get off more when shagging other women, or are they saying women get women off better than men?  As it turns out, they’re saying both, and something else.  From an opinion piece on said study, “Lesbians know the secret to the best orgasms you’re not having”, a bisexual woman explains:
Lesbians, though, reportedly have less trouble reaching orgasm than straight or bi women. Sexologists as far back as Masters and Johnson theorized that lesbians enjoyed sex more because they weren’t inhibited by the same gendered expectations of performance and pleasure – or chaste endurance– that plagues hetero pairings.
Basically, straight women come less because they’re too busy being 'proper' to come.  Lesbians, on the other hand, appear to have less inhibitions because they’re, well, more open, seeing as how they’ve already broken social convention and no longer feel the need to be restrained about their sexual pleasure.  But that's not all it is, is it?

Slight detour.  This then begs the question, why do bisexual women orgasm less?  You’d think they have the best of both worlds, no?  Apparently not.  From the same article:
The lesbian orgasm rate isn’t just about an advanced skill set, though. The study also determined that the way women sexually identify affects how frequently they orgasm – and bisexual women fare the worst, regardless of whom they’re trying to reach orgasm with. But bi-visibility, and the still-limited understanding that bisexuality exists as more than just a waystation between deciding to be gay or straight, is still hard for many of us to navigate publicly…and in the bedroom. So if self-identification – and comfort and attachment to that identification – affects the orgasm ratio, it’s not surprising that bisexual women lag behind.
I can only assume the same argument applies to bisexual men as well, their numbers are also lowest amongst men.  We shall revisit this bisexual story another day, I suspect it bears some discussion, no?  Detour over.

I've got the problem
You got the solvin
Baby...

Now even as I was reading these articles about lesbians having better sex and whatnot, I was thinking what I can only assume you are thinking right now, how are they doing this without a penis involved?  Don’t even try to pretend you’re not wondering how they do what they do the way they do.  I know you were, because I was too.  Let’s do a quick comparison of hetero and lesbian sex, shall we?  A typical shag with a man usually consists of brief foreplay, penetration, then climax (for him?).  A typical shag between two women, on the other hand, and this I can only guess from extensive consumption of quality erotica, is much less rigid (pun unintended).  The author of the fine piece of feminist writing (above) gloats…
The first time I ever had sex with a woman, I remember being overwhelmed – and not in the way I had expected. Over the course of several hours, we had three all-encompassing orgasms each and, finally, I understood the significance of our recovery periods (or the lack thereof) to women’s capacity for pleasure. It even gave me a newfound empathy for the plight of your average heterosexual male, inwardly sighing that his partner might be ready to go at it again already. Then I smugly counted my XY fortune.
Three orgasms.  Each.  No dick.  Stop frowning, gentlemen, this is just one woman’s experience.  I shall now have a wee chuckle.

Gentlemen, women aren’t built like you.  We don’t need to take a 30 minute nap and a snack after we come, we just keep going and going and going...  Like she says, we have some empathy for you unlucky buggers, you got the short end of the stick when it comes to the come, but that empathy will only take you so far.  Put differently, while we expect that you shall be completely useless once you climax, we expect that you shall endeavour to ensure we climax, hopefully several times, before you collapse into a drained stupor.  Either that or you get us a female lover to do the job you choose not to, your choice.  It goes without saying that right now most women reading this, or maybe just me, are currently very open to the idea of shagging a woman, once we, I, overcome the minor matter of the missing dick...

Do lesbians have more orgasms because they know women better than men ever could?  From the study:
In the study text, the researchers posit the higher lesbian percentage could be attributed to factors such as "self-identified lesbian women are more comfortable and familiar with the female body and thus, on average, are better able to induce orgasm in their female partners." Other reasonings include: length of the sexual encounter, attitude towards gender, sexual roles during intercourse and possible hormonal differences.
Why yes, it seems they do.  Women, it seems, really do it better.

Chuckling some more...

Just like chocolate melts all over ice cream
I wanna pour myself all over you
I know it sounds crazy
sounds like it tastes good too...

I’m not trying to turn this into a men don’t know how to get women off discussion, that’s not what I do, is it?  I’m a firm believer in learning to get yourself off (take that as you will), convinced that it always starts with you.  We’ve talked about orgasms before, at length, and by now you know women usually take longer to come than men do, don’t you?  Don’t you?  You buggers don’t read the links I put up, do you?  And do you want to know how I know you don’t read the links?  One of the orgasm posts had a link to a satire piece on the male orgasm and it was complete and utter bollocks, but to date, not a one of you has pointed it out.  No, no, don’t try and explain, I don’t want to hear it, but know that one day there will be a test, and all you idiots will fail miserably, so there, dammit.  'Where was I?' she asks, wiping righteous indignation inspired spittle off her chin.  Orgasms.  Two points to revisit from the tension post.

First:
You may have heard that it takes a lot longer for women to reach orgasm than it does for men. This is not entirely true. During masturbation, women and men reach orgasm in very similar amounts of time. On average, women reach orgasm in a little less than four minutes. For men the average time is between two and three minutes. The difference in the time it takes women and men to reach orgasm during foreplay and vaginal intercourse is greater. On average, it takes women 10-20 minutes to reach orgasm. Men reach orgasm after 7-14 minutes overall, but average two to three minutes after beginning intercourse.
See, up there when they mentioned the length of the sexual encounter, this is what they were talking about.  Men, admittedly not all men, simply don’t take the time to get their women off, whereas a woman is automatically in sync with her female lover, if only biologically.  This one issue of how long the sex lasts is the one complaint you will always get from women and with good reason, it takes us longer.

Second (from the same article):
Most women experience orgasm through clitoral stimulation rather than through vaginal penetration. So if you are having difficulty reaching orgasm with a partner, try clitoral stimulation during, before, or after vaginal intercourse or oral sex.
It's (almost) all about the clit, which is to say the odds of you pounding her into happiness are slim to non-existent, not unless said pounding is accompanied by dexterous fingers.  Or a woman.  Gentlemen, this is the one sad, or happy I like to think, truth about making a woman come, you need to play with her sweet spot, her love button...I just cringed a little typing that, no more crap synonyms...play with her clitoris.  Fingers are good, mouth is much better.  Much, much, much better.  Did I say how much better your mouth is?

You don’t have to worry bout givin me too much
One thing baby, yeah, you never get enough
I've got the problem
You got the solvin
Sugar...

Just between you and me, I think the reason lesbians have more orgasms than straight women is because of this one thing.  Oral sex. I figure, not having a penis between you allows you to focus on giving and receiving orgasms the way you best enjoy, which means less 'bang bang cum' and more 'licky licky'.

I know, its crass, but dammit if it's not the smartest thing I've said all night.

Just can't get enough
Lovin you...

We shall talk about Ray Parker Jr, soon.