I knew if I waited long enough, and
prayed to my gods hard enough, that one day someone would figure out
how to make a man (or a woman, who knows?) fall in love with me. I
knew this day would come, and it finally did. Strictly speaking,
that day came 20 years ago, but let's not split hairs. It's official
people, a couple of questions and four minutes of gazing into
someone's eyes is all you need. Can I get an amen?!
As tempting as it is to use Foreigner
as today's soundtrack, I shall curb my fondness for 80's pop ballads
and use a 60's soul classic instead. Granted, I'm using the cover
done in 1982, but it's not a ballad so...
I need love, love, ooh, to ease my
mind
And I need to find time
Someone to call mine
And I need to find time
Someone to call mine
My mama said...
Back in 1997, a couple of scientists
conducted a study on close relationships, not specifically on
romantic relationships, eventually creating a set of 36 questions
that, when asked in sequence, create closeness between the
respondents. Simply put, the questions help in bonding. Dr Aron
explains
(36 Questions for Intimacy, Back Story):
The basis of
the 36 questions is that back-and-forth self-disclosure, that
increases gradually (not too fast), is consistently linked with
coming to like the other person you do this with. We just made it a
systematic method that could be used in the lab. In more recent
research by Harry Reis and colleagues, another factor is also proving
very important - being responsive to the other's self-disclosure!
These factors are important for both starting a relationship, and
even more important, for its continued quality.
She then goes further to explain that
this is not a recipe for love...
We had not
created the 36 questions to help you fall in love. To do a good job
of that we would have needed to do a study with people who, above
all, came into it really wanting to fall in love, and we were not in
that business!
The
reason for that disclaimer is this article, causing a great deal of
buzz the past two weeks, To Fall in Love With Anyone, Do This,
in which the author describes trying out this experiment, albeit in a
more casual setting, and falling in love.
I first read
about the study when I was in the midst of a breakup. Each time I
thought of leaving, my heart overruled my brain. I felt stuck. So,
like a good academic, I turned to science, hoping there was a way to
love smarter.
You can see how I got hooked by this
article, no?
I explained the
study to my university acquaintance. A heterosexual man and woman
enter the lab through separate doors. They sit face to face and
answer a series of increasingly personal questions. Then they stare
silently into each other’s eyes for four minutes. The most
tantalizing detail: Six months later, two participants were married.
They invited the entire lab to the ceremony. “Let’s try
it,” he said.
You're loving the science too now,
aren’t you? But wait...
Let me
acknowledge the ways our experiment already fails to line up with the
study. First, we were in a bar, not a lab. Second, we weren’t
strangers. Not only that, but I see now that one neither suggests nor
agrees to try an experiment designed to create romantic love if one
isn’t open to this happening.
And so it came to pass that 36
questions later, plus the recommended four minutes of staring into
each other's eyes, the happy couple was suitably enamoured with each
other and are now in love. Aaaaawwww...
Now, the romantic in me was slightly
wet of eye at the end of that article. The cynic, however, she that
writes this blog, she was having none of it. '36 whatnow?' she
scoffed. I went off in search of the questions, and the original
study, convinced it was all a load of guff. Not so much as it turns
out.
The questions are grouped into three sets of 12 questions each, of slowly
increasing depth, starting off with a simple, 1. Given the choice
of anyone in the world, whom would you want as a dinner guest?,
graduating to 13. If a crystal ball could tell you the truth about
yourself, your life, the future or anything else, what would you want
to know?, with the last set starting off with, 25. Make three
true “we” statements each. For instance, “We are both in this
room feeling ...” By the time you're on the last question, 36.
Share a personal problem and ask your partner’s advice on how he or
she might handle it. Also, ask your partner to reflect back to you
how you seem to be feeling about the problem you have chosen.,
you've pretty much gone past most of the boundaries you normally
maintain when you meet someone new. The idea behind this is quite
simple, the mutual self disclosure creates a feeling of intimacy
between you. Incidentally, I can't find any reference to the eye
gazing in the original study, but I skimmed through most of the methodology, so perhaps it's in
there somewhere (shakes head vehemently). I'm leaving that bit out,
it sounds a little creepy, even for me who loves to stare at people.
Question is, does this intimacy created
by the question and answer sequence lead to attraction, or does the
attraction need to be there from the beginning? Put differently, can
you ask someone you like these 36 questions and get them to like you
back? Come now, that's all we really want to know, isn’t it? The
short answer. Perhaps. What's important is both parties have
to willing to open up for this exercise to work, which then means you
can't ambush that guy you've been stalking with a bloody
questionnaire and expect the magic to happen. That said, assuming
both parties are genuine and don't hold back, then, voilĂ ! You'll
fall in love like the author of that lovely tale, or, as was
originally intended, you become friends.
The scientists issued a
disclaimer at the end of their paper:
So are we
producing real closeness? Yes and no. We think that the closeness
produced in these studies is experienced as similar in many important
ways to felt closeness in naturally occurring relationships that
develop over time. On the other hand, it seems unlikely that the
procedure produces loyalty, dependence, commitment, or other
relationship aspects that might take longer to develop.
You can't sue them if it doesn’t
work. Now you know.
You can't hurry love
No, you'll just have to wait
She said love don't come easy
But it's a game of give and take
She said love don't come easy
But it's a game of give and take
You can't hurry love
No, you'll just have to wait
Just trust in a good time
No matter how long it takes...
No, you'll just have to wait
Just trust in a good time
No matter how long it takes...
Can you make someone fall in love with
you?
From the NYT article:
Most of us
think about love as something that happens to us. We fall. We get
crushed.
But what I like
about this study is how it assumes that love is an action. It assumes
that what matters to my partner matters to me because we have at
least three things in common, because we have close relationships
with our mothers, and because he let me look at him.
I wondered what
would come of our interaction. If nothing else, I thought it would
make a good story. But I see now that the story isn’t about us;
it’s about what it means to bother to know someone, which is really
a story about what it means to be known.
It’s true you can’t choose who loves you, although I’ve spent years hoping otherwise, and you can’t create romantic feelings based on convenience alone. Science tells us biology matters; our pheromones and hormones do a lot of work behind the scenes.
But despite all
this, I’ve begun to think love is a more pliable thing than we make
it out to be. Arthur Aron’s study taught me that it’s possible —
simple, even — to generate trust and intimacy, the feelings love
needs to thrive.
Ms Catron seems to think so.
I’m
inclined to agree.
Don’t look so surprised.
What they describe here is not too
different from what you experience during online dating, or a holiday
fling cum love affair, or a long evening with good company. That
intense rush you get from getting to know someone very well, very
quickly, this is what its all about, see? This is why, she wags her
finger, meeting strangers on the internet is so bloody dangerous, its
an experiment! Wait, no, sorry, that's my conspiracy theory gear
kicking in. Ignore that bit. Seriously though, internet dating,
much like all dating, is basically one long questionnaire. You start
off on favourite colours and before you know it you're talking about
your pet dog Simba who was run over by your father that evening he
came home drunk, and all this in a matter of hours. It's the Aron
experiment, on computer. Same thing happens when you have a mind
fuck night, talking into the wee hours with a (former) stranger about
anything and everything. The questions themselves are not the point
of this exercise, what matters is the order in which these, or any
other questions are asked.
Dr Aron explains:
Dr Aron explains:
...please know
that those 36 are only suggestions. If you are going to use this
approach with more than one person, or more than once with a
particular partner, you may need to make up new questions so your
answers don't become rote. Whatever questions you use, they should
gradually escalate in personalness. If you don't want to rewrite
them, you could use every third or fourth from the list of 36, one or
a few from each of the three sections, but always include the ones
that build the particular relationship, such as the three things you
both have in common.
What she's describing is exactly
what we do when dating. We ask questions to find out about the other
person, the questions getting more intimate as we open up more to
each other, and the questions tend to focus on finding commonalities.
All this experiment does is expedite the matter, says the
non-scientist with a degree in google. It also explains why we bond closely with people who, a. ask us about ourselves, b. listen to
what we tell them, and c. tell us about themselves in return.
No, I can't bear to live my life
alone
I grow impatient for a love to call my own
But when I feel that I, I can't go on
Well, these precious words keep me hanging on, I remember mama said...
I grow impatient for a love to call my own
But when I feel that I, I can't go on
Well, these precious words keep me hanging on, I remember mama said...
You can't hurry love...
Bottom line. Dear Phil Collins, mama lied. Love can in fact be hurried along.
Line after the bottom line. Yes, I can
make you love me, if, and only if you want me to.
Line after the line after the bottom
line. I've been right all along, you foolish buggers, asking
questions is the secret to love and happiness. If only you could
hear me laugh my evil laugh right now... For the record, I am going
to milk this story the entire year. Don’t look at me like that,
this is manna from heaven, no? Exactly. I'm thinking a new Dr A
series...